Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duckstation (emulator)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:47, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Duckstation (emulator) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. All of the current sources are primary, user generated, or otherwise unreliable. I used the WP:VG/S Google searches and found only one reliable source, but at two sentences/paragraphs about the subject it's hardly significant. A more general Google search turned up only the usual primary sources, databases, forums, social media posts, etc. Woodroar (talk) 19:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Woodroar (talk) 19:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Not seeing any reliable sources in my search that cover it to a significant degree, aside from the one mentioned. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 02:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. After a brief BEFORE I found there are reliables sources but SIGCOV isn’t fully evident. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TandyTRS80 (talk • contribs) 07:57, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- What reliable sources did you find? Woodroar (talk) 12:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- That's not really enough to be considered a valid keep argument. What sort of sources did you find? Sergecross73 msg me 19:09, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete aside from the GamesRadar piece mentioned, all I found are stray mentions in other topics; it's clearly A Thing, but doesn't appear to meet the SIGCOV threshold. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 20:24, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.