Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duet Total Compatibility System
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Toddst1 (talk) 16:31, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Duet Total Compatibility System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Borderline WP:Advert. Declined speedy to be safe, sending to AfD. Toddst1 (talk) 00:00, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per CSD G11 mos definite spam BoL (Talk) 00:40, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spam & non-notable spam at that :o) Jasynnash2 (talk) 07:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Definitely qualifies for CSD G11. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 13:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above.--MrFishGo Fish 14:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as spam. I do not think that this is even borderline. After deletion, the page should be redirected to perfectmatch.com, although that page is also very bad.--FreeKresge (talk) 15:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as spam. I'm surprised the speedy tag was declined in the first place! -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 08:53, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete This is spam Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 03:19, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.