Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duke Terrell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 22:17, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Duke Terrell

Duke Terrell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC. ttonyb (talk) 21:30, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article is more about informing the world about this artist and how he came to fame. He was a part of an award winning group called Kwiet Storm several years ago. I am working now to provide better references and cites. Usher raymonds mother helped push them to the top of the charts. How much more credible shoul he get before he is Wiki worthy?Thank you Bambam2525 (talk) 21:39, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:MUSICBIO per WP:RELIABLE, no substantial secondary sources, the rest of the article is promotion by name dropping. The article sources his former band and his business management but not the musician. I'm accusing the author of WP:COI and gaming the system: Talk:Duke Terrell.--Ben Ben (talk) 17:29, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The Sockpuppet investigations on the two different creators of this article are getting more and more interesting. --Ben Ben (talk) 19:15, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nominator. Considering the sockpuppetry, also recommend Salt. Edward321 (talk) 13:28, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.