- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. T. Canens (talk) 23:26, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Durrell Summers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
College athlete, fails WP:ATHLETE. No indication of meeting either the general or athlete specific notability requirements. TexasAndroid (talk) 18:29, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:30, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:30, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:30, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep significant third party coverage apparent in Google news search. Gigs (talk) 01:01, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep extensive non-trivial third party coverage, thus meets GNG -Drdisque (talk) 01:55, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete An elite-level college basketball program such as Michigan State will garner more than it's fair share of "coverage". Players on these teams will frequently be the subject of "feature" articles for no other reason than their presence on the team. That does not guarantee that the player is notable. There is no indication that this player has won any postseason awards or was picked for All-America status. DarkAudit (talk) 00:34, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- To the contrary - their presence on the team and subsequent extensive media coverage indicates their notability and meeting of WP:GNG. -Drdisque (talk) 03:43, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - major college players are usually notable. He clearly meets the requirement of significant coverage in reliable sources. --B (talk) 05:41, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.