- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 21:20, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Dutch Sweets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Notability of this company not established. No third party references. Borders on WP:SPAM. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 13:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No evidence in the form of third-party reference sources indicating that this is a notable business. --DAJF (talk) 14:09, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I'm Dutch myself and have come across this web site a couple of times to check prices etc... but it fails WP:WEB and notability guildlines. --Pmedema (talk) 16:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I concur. The company does not appear to meet WP:WEB and notability. Geoff (talk) 17:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:09, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:09, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:09, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.