Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dyke tyke (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Darkwind (talk) 06:57, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dyke tyke

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP: DICTIONARY, and entirety of article already located with sources at article Fag hag. Holdek (talk) 13:29, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:35, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:35, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary. We do not have articles that merely define terms, which this one is.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:29, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Editors interested in this article should also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girlfag and guydyke. "Dyke tyke" and "guydyke" appear to be synonyms. The two sources cited here might be useful somewhere. I'm not going to suggest merging this article into that one, though, because it's not clear what will happen to that article. Cnilep (talk) 22:08, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a neologism more suitable to Wiktionary. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:31, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.