- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. A7, no credible claims to notability GedUK 11:36, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Dylan Dynamite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'll be the first to admit that I'm not an expert when it comes to wrestling, but I can't see any notability here. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:53, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 04:08, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete This is a 14 year old kid with a backyard and a trampoline. Wikipedia is littered with the ashes of hundreds, if not thousands, of deleted backyard wrestling articles. This one will meet the same fate. DarkAudit (talk) 05:22, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No indication of notability, and I can't find much in the way of secondary sources upon a brief Google search. Current article is unencyclopedic as well. –Juliancolton | Talk 05:35, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete fail to see how a 14-year old kid can claim to be a notable wrestler. Claims related to DWE don't stand up to scrutiny when it turns out DWE is his own invention (see Talk:Dylan Dynamite). Simply unencyclopedic vanity. Astronaut (talk) 08:59, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.