- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedily deleted by User:Irishguy as an attack page. Dlohcierekim 23:29, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Dylan Johnson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
WP:V and WP:OR. Doesn't google. —Caesura(t) 19:01, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:V (WP:HOAX?). --Brewcrewer 19:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the only source is a personal interview. Totally fails WP:V. Also not inherently notable (although use as an insult against LBJ is possibly notable in the Lyndon B. Johnson article). Totnesmartin 19:27, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Lacks notability, no reliable sources cited. Potentially very serious BLP violation. Heidianddick 19:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can see, but not in good sources, a claim by a particular individual to have born a son out of wedlock fathered by LBJ. To the extent I can find any name for the son even in unreliable sources, this isn't it. The claims of that particular mother are all wrapped up in a conspiracy claim that LBJ masterminded the death that led to him becoming president, which tells you just how far outside the mainstream they are. Hoax, I believe, and have so tagged. But I can't see that it meets any CSD - though if any of the named parties were known to be alive, we would have reason to ax at least some of the content quite quickly. GRBerry 22:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I was really tempted to go ahead and speedy delete this, but we should not be hasty. Unless a verifiable source can be found, it should go. Not sure how strong the assertion of notability, "illegitimate son of a president" is. Perhaps there is a non Google source??? Dlohcierekim 22:47, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.