- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep; nicely cleaned up and referenced by Paul Erik.--Kubigula (talk) 04:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Asserts some importance, but seems non-notable WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDENplay it cool. 19:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There have been non-trivial mentions of Dylan Rice in The Advocate (at least twice) and in the Chicago Sun-Times. There has been a full article about Rice in the Chicago Tribune. I would say that's easily enough to pass WP:N. I've added those references just now. Keep. --Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 04:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Paul Erik. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 16:07, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- there is no reason to delete this page based on the deletion guidelines. -- The tatooed lady —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.126.106 (talk) 04:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.