Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Schmid (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan Schmid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR and is possibly WP:TOOSOON. Minor actor at the moment, but early days. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creep (talk) 12:19, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I fixed the formatting of this nomination, which had been attached to the first nomination by mistake, but I have no opinion about whether the page should be deleted or not. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:37, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
~~Strong Delete and Salt~~. This should have been deleted the first time around. All the coverage did was noted how minor an actor he is really is. He didn't even appear in the IMDB listing on the first ref until somebody added in him later, and is not in the first grouping on IMDB. Exceedingly. Clearly fails WP:NACTOR, and subsequently WP:BIO and possibly WP:TOOSOON possibly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scope creep (talk • contribs) 01:34, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete BLP with no sources and appears not to not notable. KylieTastic (talk) 00:02, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note that the unsigned "delete" vote was posted by the nominator. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:16, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:16, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Seemed to have voted in own WP:AFD. Please ignore "Strong Delete and Salt". scope_creep (talk) 02:08, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Struck duplicate !vote above North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:51, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.