Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan and Hayden Whitbread

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 09:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan and Hayden Whitbread

Non-notable. Two year olds? They have no specific or heavy press coverage and have a lone acting gig in their long careers. Lawrence § t/e 17:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List_of_recurring_and_minor_Coronation_Street_characters#Freddie_Peacock for now, turn into a real article later. Delete is also acceptable. Do the same for other one-character minor actors who have little notability. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 18:37, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable one year olds! Dreamspy (talk) 18:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'm sure their parents are very proud of them, but they're basically just props - actors indeed! Camillus (talk) 23:52, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable kiddies. I just moved the page to conform with other twins, since they had two articles. They really don't need the one. Morhange (talk) 00:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question - moved from where? Can it be moved back? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 00:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - Each twin had their own article: Dylan Whitbread and Hayden Whitbread, so I combined them here. Morhange (talk) 04:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This should've been PRODded or perhaps even speedied rather than AfD'd. Since Morhange obviosly agrees with the prodding, and since but for the fact that there is an AfD in progress, she could have speeded it as the sole editor, I recommend that if and only if there are no objections within a couple of days days we snowball this puppy. I put a notice of the AfD on Talk:List of characters from Coronation Street. That is the only article that links to this article. 2 days should be plenty of time to see if anyone can give a good reason to keep this article. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 00:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above, clearly fails to reach notability threshold. - Dravecky (talk) 06:22, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.