Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DynaScan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:04, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DynaScan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

DynaScan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A digital sign manufacturer that fails WP:NCORP. The references in the article are all promotional; searching for new references turned up nothing significant, independent, and reliable.

Article was apparently created as advertising; note the older versions. It is jealously guarded by several SPAs, one of which authored the article and has a name equivalent to the company's products. These accounts and IP canceled my PROD and keep removing my cleanup tags. -Crossroads- (talk) 18:47, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -Crossroads- (talk) 18:47, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -Crossroads- (talk) 18:47, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -Crossroads- (talk) 18:47, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. -Crossroads- (talk) 18:47, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I am unable to locate any references for this company that meet the criteria for establishing notability. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:46, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability - just existing is not notable - three of the references are press-releases and the fourth is to the company's own website - not enough significant coverage per WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGCRIT, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:NCORP or WP:GNG - Epinoia (talk) 21:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.