- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Author request (G7) Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 17:51, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Dynami:t (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Real product, possibly popular, not notable. There is no significant coverage, and there is little hope of expanding this article past ingredients, sizes, and availability. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 00:37, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable product, a good candidate for a speedy delete. --Sander Säde 07:21, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - After searching, not finding coverage in reliable sources, let alone significant coverage. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:42, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Requested speedy. Jared Preston (talk) 14:03, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.