Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic Photo HDR
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:54, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Dynamic Photo HDR (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability, looks like spam. Darxus (talk) 00:03, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:28, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 03:59, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The article subject appears to have been substantially covered in a number of third-party sources, judging by the hits provided by the Google News and Book searches. This article doesn't appear to be THAT spammy, apart from the last sentence inviting readers to download the software (and that's easily fixed). Bettia (talk) 13:10, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - per Bettia's arguments. Wickedjacob (talk) 07:27, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. elektrikSHOOS 10:36, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Google news results are mostly in German and Spanish so I used Google translator. Popular Photography Magazine says its one of the most popular HDR Programs. [1] Other results to sort through, but it appears to be a very popular bit of software, so its notable by software standards. Dream Focus 18:45, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.