Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic Saturation Modeling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 10:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamic Saturation Modeling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Contested prod that was speedy deleted once as advertising. The term is a trademark of the company, apparently, but the article doesn't give enough information about it to explain it. There aren't many online explanations, so I believe it should be deleted. KrakatoaKatie 03:15, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, insufficient context, thinly-veiled spam. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:37, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as nn technology designed by nn company. Fails WP:V Sting au Buzz Me... 05:36, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Gavin Collins (talk) 09:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as this is spam dressed up as a non-notable neogolism. --Gavin Collins (talk) 09:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, ditto. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - an article isn't deletable simply because it contains spam (if there is legitimate content as well, and there is in this case), or because it's a trademarked version of something. We have articles for Martinizing Dry Cleaning, Broasted chicken, and Robitussin, all of which are for all practical purposes identical to other brands and therefore nothing more than names. The problem here and the reason this should be deleted is what the nominator hints at, it's just not notable in this case. If the content is usable it's in the article about guitar amps or one about the company that invented or uses the technology. Wikidemo (talk) 19:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.