Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic stochastic economics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 03:59, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Things get very complicated very quickly in economic theory." This article may have something to do with Dynamic stochastic economics or it may not. We may never know. --Tagishsimon (talk)

• Delete. Perhaps this AfD will attract the attention of someone who knows enough about this theory to make the article comprehensible. If that happens, I'd probably vote keep. However, since the article has been around for a year in its current state, I'm very much doubting that will happen. Peyna 03:08, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Peyna AdamBiswanger1 03:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment You have to admit, "Things get very complicated very quickly in economic theory." is profound. Teke 03:39, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was blown away at first. Sometimes when you read something like that you just need to sit down and digest it for a while. AdamBiswanger1 04:25, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Though the article may die, the begining will forever live on in the archive of my userspace, as I made it my Quote of the Week. Teke 06:19, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete That quote is positively brilliant. If somebody knowledgeable came around and wrote an explanation in the article, I too would probably change my vote to keep. --Alphachimp ^talk 06:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• I have to admit I prefer the bare-bones first version before someone felt the obligation to explain this to humans. Uh, Delete. Should be speedied because no notability is asserted, but maybe someone can milk this for something marginally useful in the next week. ~ trialsanderrors 06:40, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:V...and this might be speedy material (no context?). --Coredesat 07:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• delete It appears the editor is referring to Stochastic programming optimization in economics, and can typeset formulae, but can't be bothered to expain anything. Article seems deliberately obfuscatory. Pete.Hurd 19:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• delete. It's possible the formula means something, but I doubt it. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 00:21, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.