Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic synesthesia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:49, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamic synesthesia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is essentially unreferenced OR, and has been tagged as such since December of 2009. This article has not been edited since March, 2010, and as a substantive contributor to the synesthesia page, I do not feel that there is anything worth editing here. I believe this article fails under WP:NEO. A google search turns up 163 hits [1], while synesthesia itself turns up 476,000 results [2], and "grapheme-color synesthesia" one of the most intensively researched forms of synesthesia, turns up 2,180 results [3]. Note that wiki's synesthesia page and grapheme-color synesthesia page are the number one hits in these searches. Similarly, a pubmed search of dynamic synesthesia turns up two hits, both of which merely contain both words in the title, but do not refer to "dynamic synesthesia" as a form of synesthesia. This is against a total of 252 hits for "synesthesia or synaesthesia" in pubmed Edhubbard (talk) 03:15, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Original research, fails verifiability. Edison (talk) 03:26, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unverifiable. Even if this describes a legitimate concept, it should be written into the journals before coming here. - Richard Cavell (talk) 11:34, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there is no evidence available NCurse _work 16:53, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.