Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-Prime (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. YA RLY. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:34, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

E-Prime (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A software suite written up in spammy tone and with scant evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:32, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 15:19, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 15:20, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Software for "paradigm creation"? What the hell? It offers control over almost every aspect of paradigm creation, and is temporally accurate to within a few milliseconds, a crucial aspect of control for many research needs. One of the benefits to E-Prime is its user base of over ten thousand. When it's unambiguous advertising like this, notability isn't even an issue. Pity, too; this software is apparently used to run some kind of psychological testing, and if technical rather than PR people had written it, some useful information about an interesting field might have slipped in inadvertently. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:32, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Too bad that we can't add a {{humor}} banner ;-) Boghog (talk) 17:30, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no reliable sources to establish notability of this software. Dialectric (talk) 20:19, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete clear cut G11, (spam) tagged as such Secret ^account 04:05, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.