- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 16:54, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- E-crowd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, no assertion of notability. . Original research. Prod flag removed by IP editor Velella Velella Talk 16:37, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Neologism, original research, self-promotion, etc. Note the link to Computer Society of India which states: "Presentation on E-Crowd by Sri Harshit Srivastava [author of the article], the young boy of 14 years, student of class –IX of ECPSSS, Allahabad was very interesting." — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:07, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Someone's neologism presented at a conference. EEng (talk) 17:26, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable neologism. --Pnm (talk) 05:44, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO and WP:NOR. JohnCD (talk) 11:07, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.