- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:25, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- E.F.A. Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable opensource software. No significant coverage in reliable sources. References given are either to directory entries, primary sources, from unreliable sources or trivial coverage. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 11:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 15:04, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 08:23, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as too soon at best and draft and userfy if needed later. Notifying tagger Dat GuyWiki in case they have any comments. SwisterTwister talk 06:47, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Wikipedia:Golden rule. Dat GuyWiki (talk) 09:14, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.