- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:07, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- E.L.V (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable, maybe hoax beacuse google dosen't showed so much... The Rolling Camel (talk) 22:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete agree that the lack of any clear evidence supports a delete. Usrnme h8er (talk) 22:13, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, perhaps speedily for lacking context. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 22:17, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No reference provided, lacks content, speedy delete. Newport Beach (talk) 22:41, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete even if it existed, this article is effervescent. JuJube (talk) 00:15, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to ELV 76.66.195.159 (talk) 07:00, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.