Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E.S.Poyser and Sons
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 03:30, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- E.S.Poyser and Sons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete per lack of notability established through significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. No references indicated or citations provided. Unable to identify references for content. Article created by a descendant family member, so could be original research. Does not meet the general notability guidelines. Cind.amuse (Cindy) 01:43, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:12, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, weakly. Article is about a local chain of jewellery stores, a family operation predating WWI. A longstanding consumer business like that might have some kind of cultural resonance, but Google News and Books all draw blanks: one book result for "Poyser and Sons" (no news hits) from a guy who bought an antique watch with a trademark from there and mentions it in passing. If any reliable sources can be found I might be persuaded to change my mind. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:37, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of notable media coverage, I didn't see anything on both Yahoo! and Google. SwisterTwister talk 21:07, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.