Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EBricks Outlet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:55, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EBricks Outlet

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. This company appears to be notable for one event: becaming the largest Lego distributor after winning an auction of more than 8 million parts in 2017. There is little coverage of this company outside of that one event, and that one event appears to have had no depth of coverage, per WP:COVERAGE, and no historical or widespread effect, per WP:LASTING. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:27, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meets WP:GNG and WP:COVERAGE guidelines after multiple sources have been cited and added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OneEditADay (talk • contribs) 18:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC) OneEditADay (talk) 18:30, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Additional content and notable events have been added to meet WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:LASTING criteria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OneEditADay (talk • contribs) 21:29, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:07, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:07, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:27, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:40, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A run-of-the-mill store with no indications of notability. None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability. Most are based on announcements from the store with quotations from store personnel, are therefore not intellectually independent and fail WP:ORGIND. Equally, none provide any in-depth information on the company, failing WP:CORPDEPTH. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:30, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.