- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted under WP:CSD#A7. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:33, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- ECMW Films (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, no reliable sources, page creator has COI. GregJackP Boomer! 11:39, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is close to a speedy for G11. The article clearly isn't notable. Ryan Vesey Review me! 13:13, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, no claim to notability. Hairhorn (talk) 14:15, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Even if it doesn't quite meet the criteria for G11, it most certainly does meet the criteria for A7. I've tagged it as such, in the hopes of having it deleted without having to go through the whole AFD period. Rorshacma (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.