- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 04:51, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- EDENext (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
New research project, great plans, but only just kicked off, so nothing to report yet. No coverage in independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 07:58, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:48, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Should "Article is about a European Union research project" be a criterion for speedy deletion by now? I can't recall any of them that were ever really notable; and worse, all of them are written up in atrociously slanted but unintelligible bureaucratese prose. This one purports to be about something interesting (infectious diseases) but the non-neutral bollocks of the text takes great pains to conceal that all the project has on its menu so far is to plan to have more meetings: Due to environmental and economic changes, emerging diseases with zoonotic potential will be an increasing challenge for public health in Europe. The risks and the consequences triggered by vector-borne diseases for public health in Europe are just starting to emerge in the public awareness. EDENext is following a holistic, transdisciplinary public health approach towards vector-borne diseases. Sensible risk communication will be developed, based on scientific risk assessment on one hand, and taking into account public risk perception on the other.... EDENext intends to go further towards understanding the ecological and biological mechanisms that result in epidemics of such diseases. We will be placing strong emphasis on the social and economic factors that favour contamination, and controlling disease risk. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:48, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-neutral POV and bureaucrat-speech nonsense can be repaired with some forceful editing. A lack of independent sources can't. This topic has no shortage of web presence and may actually be accomplishing something genuinely interesting, but everything here is just fluff without some concrete independent verification. §everal⇒|Times 19:10, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Much of the material is also copied from pages like this one with limited paraphrasing. Might be a copyright problem. §everal⇒|Times 19:13, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:08, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.