Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EDP445 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:42, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

EDP445

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/EDP445
• Articles for deletion/EDP445 (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

EDP445 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sourcing is not good for this incredibly controversial biography. All sources are at best marginal when this is someone only known for extremely controversial acts that would need very high quality RS to include. Does not meet WP:NBIO. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:15, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Internet. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:15, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California and Nevada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:38, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per nom ^{themoon@talk:~$} 09:10, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I found significant coverage about him here: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 14:22, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These are all e-celebrity gossip news websites, I don't think they are the "high quality" sources Parakanyaa was talking about -- especially considering that the topic of this biography is solely known for being arrested once but never prosecuted for a quite tacky charge. V. S. Video (talk) 17:21, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

None of these are reliable sources for anything. Especially for a BLP notable for alleged crime. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:23, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I did my own WP:BEFORE and also saw fit to exclude from consideration non-RS mentioned above, and several more. I agree with nom's rationale. JFHJr (㊟) 04:48, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  And per the original discussion. JFHJr (㊟) 04:53, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep sources exist 2600:4040:40F2:5700:ADD3:D6A6:B3E:CA3E (talk) 22:23, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Beyond sources discussing the sting operation (WP:BLP1E) there really isn't enough sourcing to meet GNG. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 16:32, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Violates WP:BLP1E KnowDeath (talk) 20:58, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.