Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EEmpACT Staffing Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:24, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

EEmpACT Staffing Software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage. A CSD was previosly declined. This sounds like an advertisement and the award does not appear to be significant. SL93 (talk) 19:19, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I agree that there is no extensive coverage in independent sources, so Wikipedia's standard for establishing notability has not been met. Google hits are promotional and passing mentions; GNews hits are press releases. Dawn Bard (talk) 12:53, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete essentially unreferenced company article - the only 3rd party reference is a deadlink to an award for which the product was a finalist, not sufficient to establish notability. Dialectric (talk) 10:24, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.