- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Deleted per CSD G5. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:10, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- EFC Limited (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No real demonstration of notability. Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Promotional tone. Fails WP:SUSTAINED. References provided are either mentions-in-passing (fails WP:CORPDEPTH) or rely almost exclusively on company produced material and/or quotations (fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND). Edwardx (talk) 22:23, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Not only fails WP:CORPDEPTH, but does not even make any claims to notability within the article text. Loopy30 (talk) 02:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 03:13, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 03:13, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 03:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.