Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EFEM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as WP:CSD#G5 by Deepfriedokra. ✗plicit 03:20, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EFEM

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

EFEM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a rapper, not making or reliably sourcing any strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The only notability claim being made here is that he and his music exist, which is not an automatic notability freebie in and of itself, and the sourcing consists of a mixture of primary sources (music self-verifying its own existence on streaming platforms) that aren't support for notability with very short and unsubstantive blurbs in publications of uncertain reliability, not adding up to enough coverage to pass NMUSIC #1 in lieu of any of NMUSIC's more achievement-based criteria (charting hits, major music awards, etc.) Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have more and better sources than this. Bearcat (talk) 15:25, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Additional note here to advise that the page creator has attempted to blank this discussion and replace it with an "order" that Wikipedia is not allowed to "touch" the article, which is obviously not how Wikipedia process works. (They also attempted to strip the AFD template from the article, but did it in a wrong way that failed to actually accomplish what they thought they were doing — but that will obviously have to be monitored as well just in case.) Bearcat (talk) 16:34, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:25, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:25, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I googled "efem albania", and found 1; then "efem shqip", and found 2. Neither those nor the citations in the article are anywhere near WP:RS. Fails WP:NBIO and WP:NMUSICIAN. (I note that there seems never to have been an article in Albanian WP.) Narky Blert (talk) 11:14, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

collapse nowhere discussion with irate article creator.

DO NOT TOUCH THIS PAGE WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM YOU HAVE ALL PROUVE DOWN BELOW IF YOU TOUCH THIS I AM GONA DELETE ALL YOUR ARTICLES Bearcat TAKE OF THE DELETE MESSAGE IMEDIATLYWikipeddias (talk) 17:12, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] That's not how this works. Talk to me like that again and your edit privileges will be blocked for violating our civility rules. Bearcat (talk) 17:23, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] Sir, why you nominated this page for deletion? What's the problem? If you need facts I send it here but you cant make this I work so much for this you have to take away the deletion in screen up on please. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeXs9zgcbzyiPMqO9-IL3KQ https://www.instagram.com/efemits/?hl=fr I send you other many facts media and all this stuff if you needWikipeddias (talk) 21:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] Sorry to budge in. @Wikipeddias: Those aren't reliable sources. Anybody can post stuff on Instagram or YouTube - that's not news.--03:19, 27 September 2021 (UTC) @Narky Blert: Not having an article in original language doesn't mean that it fails notability. We have many articles on various subjects, a quarter of which don't have a page in it's official language.--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 03:19, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] BETTER DO NOT TOUCH MY ARTICLE THATS ALL I CAN SAY YOU DONT COME HERE TO SAY ME WHAT I CANT POST OR LINK I AM PROFESSIONAL ON THIS LET THIS THING GO AND DONT COMMENT HERE AGAIN TO SAY ME THAT I CANT WIKIPEDIA IS FREE PLACE FOR ALL PEOPLE SO YES OF COURSE DO NOT MAKE ME TO EVEN IF I am blocked with this user THAT CANT STOP ME TAKE AWAY THE MESSAGE OF DELETION IMMEDIATELY LAST CALL do your Job BearcatWikipeddias (talk) 05:04, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] IF SOMTHING HAPPEND TO THIS ARTICLE I KNOW EXACTLY YOUR ARTICLES AS WELL SO YOU HAVE A LOT OF TUFF HERE SO GO AND TOUCH IT THIS I PROMIS YOU YOU WILL RIGRET JUST GO AND TOUCH IT I HAVE A LOT TO DO AFTER TO TO YOURS AS WELL LETS WIKIPEDIA KNOW THAT ME I DONT LET THIS UNTIL IT SHOWS UP ON WIKIPEDIA LIVE SPACE LIKE EVRY ARTIST. TAKE OF DELETION FROM DISLPLAY. Wikipeddias (talk) 10:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] (talk) What do you mean by that. Check out down below the links of media. You can't go into Google and search (EFEM Albania)? This is a joke. Are you joking? How you go and tap EFEM Albania Bearcat???? Is very simple just check news Media, news paper, you have all down below! What a joke. You have all information! Stop wasting my time! Make this on Wikipedia live and stop playing here please. Wikipeddias (talk) 16:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] No, @Wikipeddias:, we are not. I googled his name and found nothing. Also, please stop writing in All Caps. Thank you.--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 17:13, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] mollyplly (Redacted) all this is IN GOOGLE (talk) https://www.gazetaexpress.com/efem-sjell-projektin-e-ri-muzikor-ilegal/ https://gazetaora.com/2020/05/09/lil-bo-kam-refuzuar-oferta-milioneshe/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AyiD_wThF4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhxPLk7e2nQ https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=efem+ilegalWikipeddias (talk) 18:05, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] YouTube videos are not reliable or notability-supporting sources. And note that since you ignored a direct order to speak in a civil manner, and instead kept screaming like a banshee and threatening everybody, I've been left with no choice but to block your editing privileges for 72 hours. Once the block expires you are welcome to contribute productively, but if you strike a tone like this again you will be blocked permanently. Bearcat (talk) 18:16, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I am unable to evaluate current sources on page. If someone could do so, it might be helpful. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:46, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Lacks significant coverage (sing it with me!) to meet WP:NMUSIC or WP:N. Coverage currently in article are just short publicity looking pieces about "his first song on youtube." --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:58, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and Salt: probably G11 speedy delete. VViking_TalkEdits 13:58, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Viewmont Viking: I almost tagged as such, but if AfD'd will be easier to delete if recreated w/o improvement. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:19, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Re SALT, I'd rather keep it as a honeypot. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:58, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Ima delete per WP:G5 'cause user page tagged Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of EFEM its. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:03, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was about to ask if he is a sockpuppet or not... Guess that question was already answered. He was too aggressive for a newbie.--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 01:31, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.