Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EFileCabinet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:46, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EFileCabinet

EFileCabinet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Tagged for advert concerns since 2012 and as an orphan since February 2015. Cloudbound (talk) 19:56, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 06:44, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 06:44, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as this is another classic example of an article needing deletion long ago as I simply see nothing to suggest even minimally better notability and improvement especially frmo the listed sources. SwisterTwister talk 08:02, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – Passes WP:CORPDEPTH. This is another classic example of an article about a notable company that would benefit from copy editing and the addition of reliable sources. Source examples include: ^[1], ^[2], ^[3], ^[4], ^[5], ^[6], ^[7], ^[8] North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:32, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

1. "eFileCabinet: Going Beyond The Boxes". Forbes.
2. "Lehi's eFileCabinet gives paperwork a cloudy meaning". Daily Herald.
3. "Provo company's software ends paper storage". The Salt Lake Tribune. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
4. "eFileCabinet Online". PC Magazine.
5. "eFileCabinet Review: Best Mobile Document Management". Business News Daily.
6. "eFileCabinet Raises $14 Million". Accounting Today.
7. "A Paperless Office is a Must Today". The Practical Accountant. (subscription required)
8. "No More Metal File Cabinets". The Practical Accountant. (subscription required)

• Keep - Given the sources found, the subject meets WP:CORPDEPTH. A little c/e would be nice though.—UY Scuti ^Talk 08:06, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.