Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ERDB Entity Related Database
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was already deleted by User:Cirt. JForget 14:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- ERDB Entity Related Database (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article, along with Xcelerix, were both created by the same account. It looks like these were created solely to promote the product. Now, there may indeed be some notability here, but these two new articles do nothing to indicate the importance of the topic. In any case, I can see no reason for both articles to exist. — Timneu22 · talk 15:17, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:14, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks dumbot. Twinkle must have hiccuped. — Timneu22 · talk 15:15, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:14, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.