Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ESE Productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  06:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ESE Productions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've removed the {{db-corp}} tag from this article because no admins have acted on the tag for the past four days. This indicates that speedy deletion of this article is controversial.

I have done several searches for sources on Google and Google News Archive, but have been unable to find any reliable sources. Cunard (talk) 04:52, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete- There might be notability for 'The Phantom Edit'; there is only one working reference. But I cannot find any notability for this article or any of the subarticles of this. Clubmarx (talk) 05:02, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – lacks notability. ttonyb (talk) 13:31, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I didn't act on the speedy deletion tag not because it was controversial, but because I wanted to be sure of my ground; I could not tell from the article whether it was being claimed that the "Phantom Editor" was part of ESE Productions, or simply that their work was like the Phantom Editor. I am now informed (see the talk page of the article) that the author's creators, whom I strongly suspect are ESE Productions, do not assert a relationship with the Phantom Editor other than that they assert that their work is like his. Therefore, although the Phantom Editor has demonstrable notability (see Mike J. Nichols), this group certainly does not, at least none that I can locate, and the article can safely be deleted. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:06, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.