- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 16:56, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- ETICS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable project. One of a number of articles created in an effort to promote the EU Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development. Hardly any of these have notability independent from their organizers/participants and this one is no exception. No independent sources (references present are articles/presentations by project members, no significant third-party coverage). Does not meet WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 10:19, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:36, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:48, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Yet another EU research program with vague but ambitious goals and no evidence of tangible achievement. Current text violates neutrality and is too imprecise to improve by editing. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:00, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The achievements of ETICS project are exploited by several other large follow-up projects, initiatives, and companies. E.g. among others the European Middleware Initiative (EMI), the SCIentific gateway Based User Support (SCI-BUS) project, and the 4D SOFT Ltd. - Robert Lovas - 11:19, 4 September 2011 (UTC) — rlovas (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Note that notability has nothing to do with good, bad, or achievements. --Crusio (talk) 11:08, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- delete no indication of notability and various searches turn up nothing.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 11:43, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.