- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. — Coren (talk) 04:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:NOT, WP:SPAM. Article was created by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related to ETSS and its parent. Was speedied twice previously. This is another Part of a long history of Spam and promotion on Wikipedia, See also - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#GHG_Corporation_spam_abuse GHG
Hu12 23:42, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability is substandard, and the allegation of COI seems reasonable. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 23:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Lacks and is likely to forever lack independent sourcing. Quatloo (talk) 13:25, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. :-) Stwalkerster talk 19:42, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.