- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 13:09, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- EWDraw (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:DISCRIMINATE Sulaimandaud (talk) 12:14, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The software's features are not notable and it is "indiscriminate" information. Frmorrison (talk) 14:07, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Looks like it has Copy Violations. Regardless no real notable information anyways. -Pmedema (talk) 16:49, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Obviously not notable and possibly copied from elsewhere. --Jersey92 (talk) 23:55, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Deleteas simply copied off of some site. –Davey2010 • (talk) 23:59, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete copy violations and not notable anyway --– sampi (talk•contrib•email) 04:07, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.