Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eargasm (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein (talk) 18:53, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eargasm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete: Fails WP:N and WP:RS. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 17:06, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note that the previous deleted version of this article was about a different group. — Laura Scudder ☎ 17:38, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Multiple eargasms? Oh my. --Dhartung | Talk 22:50, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom's fine summary. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Non notable nonsense. Operating (talk) 20:46, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't see how this qualifies as nonsense in any way.

• Delete, although it's just possible this could be sourced. --Dhartung | Talk 22:50, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, improperly sourced article about a seemingly non-notable group.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 15:12, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.