Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easher Austin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:51, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Easher Austin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Easher Austin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This subject is not eligible for an entry into Wikipedia as the references in the article are all primary and there is nothing elsewhere that can be added to the article to demonstrate their notability. The creator is the subject of the article himself. This is a significant COI. Centuristic (talk) 06:12, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Entertainment, and United Kingdom. Centuristic (talk) 06:12, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:49, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No sources pop up for this guy; clearly self-advertising. Why? I Ask (talk) 06:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. Also not notable for youtube stuff, very low viewcount, 633 subs. Polygnotus (talk) 07:50, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Pretty bad case of self-promotion. YouTube channel not notable. Procyon117 (talk) 15:14, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Not notable. Also, not dispositive of anything, but worth noting that I got a post on my talk page after I'd restored content they'd deleted. They claimed to be the subject of the article and saying that they wanted the page deleted. Plandu (talk) 19:19, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: not notable, I see no significant coverage in reliable sources. Frankly, this is probably WP:A7 territory, but we're here now. UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 21:46, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.