- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:54, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Easher caste (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Zero refs. Tagged for that since September. Zero gbooks hits. Zero gnews hits. Lacks substantial rs coverage. Tagged for notability since September. Created by 1-article-edited-ever SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 05:42, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 15:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I've had a look for sources, and I have to agree with the nominator that it's impossible to find any verifiable information this caste in English over the internet. It's not a scheduled caste (see [1]). Perhaps an editor who can speak Kashmiri might be able to find something ? There could be printed sources. --He to Hecuba (talk) 10:38, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:02, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Falcadore (talk) 04:18, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nom is right there is literally nothing out there. And nothing for "Easher" on it's own in this sense.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 07:35, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.