- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Please defer merge related discussion to article talk. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- EasyCruiseOne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable ship (and no assertion of notability). Oli Filth 03:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The information here in this article can be easily verified. For example, this webpage has a review about this ship. Moreover, a google search shows up quite a number of hits for this ship as well. --Siva1979Talk to me 03:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I've enough salt water in my veins to think any ship of 4,077 gross tons is going to be notable. It has sources now. Nick mallory 04:55, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to easyCruise. This ship isn't notable apart from the idea and company it is intimately connected to. It looks as though #2 is coming or has come online, but the only differences that I can see between the two are their routes, which can be covered in the main article.--Chaser - T 07:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to easyCruise especially if there are going to be multiple ships. Looking at List of cruise ships it's very hard to find examples under 10,000 tons, and consider that ships over 100,000 tons are now common. --Dhartung | Talk 12:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per Chaser and Dhartung. --Targeman 13:06, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep notable ship with an amount of history prior to easyCruise, which is why I don't think it should be merged there. It's also the star of a documentary TV series. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- That's a fair point. I also see some news sources for the ship's middle name. I suggest that if the AFD ends in keep we stick some merge tags on the article and wait a couple of weeks to allow interested parties to add information about Neptune II and Renaissance II (the ship's previous names. If nothing is forthcoming, we can merge and retarget the redirects to the appropriate section in the easyCruise article. Then leave a note on the talk page with instructions to de-merge if anyone wants to add lots of information about history under the other two names.--Chaser - T 17:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep seems notable enough --PEAR (talk) 19:06, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the ship can be easily found on google. WikiEK 14:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.