- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. Larry V (talk | contribs) 07:39, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested speedy. Sure looks like egregious spam to me. Proprietary name for particular manufacturing process. I'm happy for them, but we don't need an article consisting mainly of unsourced crowing about how their technique shaves great wads of cost from making FPGAs. Only ref is company site. Herostratus 05:59, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. MER-C 06:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It is spam act. It may be permitted to be speedy deletion.--Naohiro19 07:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It was turned into a redirect, by the way. FirefoxMan 16:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.