Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eating Addictions Anonymous

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel 07:57, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eating Addictions Anonymous (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

I don't believe there are enough reliable sources to justify this organization as notable.[1] — Craigtalbert 00:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. — Craigtalbert 00:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Frag- agree that there don't seem to be any reliable sources- only stuff I'm seeing on the web is a directory for such groups and the wikipedia article itself. David Fuchs 00:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Has not risen to a sufficient level of notability yet. Groupthink 00:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per all above and too vague.UberCryxic 01:21, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom. Nothing really on this organization yet on the web. Maybe it could come back eventually, but not now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HAL2008 (talk • contribs)
• Delete Spammy, non notable article. - G1ggy ^Talk/_Contribs 04:37, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. No assertion of notability, A7, so tagged. Cquan ^{(after the beep...)} 07:13, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.