Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebocube business model
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:20, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ebocube business model (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Author contests prod. No assertion of importance / significance. --ZhongHan (Email) 11:52, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete article fails general notability guideline. There is only this source, which discusses this term. Armbrust Talk Contribs 18:13, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, COI spam for non-notable neologism. Hairhorn (talk) 18:21, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. YOUR ONLINE BUSINESS HAS- Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:56, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4 SIMULTANEOUS ASPECTS
IN 24 HOUR ROTATIONS
Evil Editors
block and suppress Ebocube
because non notable neologism
and article says nothing substantive about it anyways
They are EDUCATED EVIL
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.