- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:15, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Ebseg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
advertising The Banner talk 01:11, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:43, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:43, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:43, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete An article packed with a dense proportion of biz-buzzwords per sentence but no solid references. A firm going about its business, but no encyclopaedic notability. (I do love the idea that the firm "lunched a unique solutions" though.) AllyD (talk) 06:54, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No properly sourced claim of notability in the article, and I didn't find sources that would demonstrate notability. --Michig (talk) 05:57, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.