- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy delete all as blatant copyvios. Stifle (talk) 17:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Eclipse cruise, Alta cruise, Galapagos Explorer II, Lammer Law cruise, Isabela II cruise, Beluga cruise
editWikipedia is not a gloss brochure for cruise ships. Likely adverts and/or copyvios from various sources, just search for any text. Sandstein 21:43, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per nom, advert.--blue520 23:13, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Eclipse cruise as a copyvio from [1], Lammer Law cruise as a copyvio from [2], Isabela II cruise as a copyvio from [3], and Beluga cruise as a copyvio from [4]. The remaining 2 no longer qualify for speedy deletion as they are older than 48 hours, but delete Alta cruise as a copyvio from [5] and Galapagos Explorer II as a copyvio from [6]. — Rebelguys2 talk 23:14, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above RayaruB 23:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, also The Beagle cruise, which I tagged as copyvio. Accurizer 16:23, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am going to speedy delete all of these article because they are all copyright violations. This editor has been warned before about doing this and, as such, I will be blocking them for 24 hours.--Alabamaboy 15:43, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.