- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 19:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neologisms shouldn't have articles based on them. The term is fictitious and doesn't have a source (i.e. no fictional character is ever described in context as being an "ecopath". I believe the term was invented to parrallel technopath, but regardless, it's all OR/a user's own invention. ~ZytheTalk to me! 13:27, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unsourced. Google suggests this is a term which does not have any standard definition—I get many hits for a certain software, some for the path of fish in the sea, etc. Kavadi carrier 13:36, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 01:28, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Xdenizen 02:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable neologism. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 04:12, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 08:43, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.