- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:03, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ecranisation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable term which is a dictionary definition at best. Lugnuts (talk) 18:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Film adaptation? Moswento (talk) 20:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I suppose a redirect could work, but I don't see that this made up word has really caught on as meaning for film adaptation. -- Whpq (talk) 16:29, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per WP:NOTDICTIONARY, "Wikipedia is not a dictionary, usage, or jargon guide." This belongs on Wiktionary where it already exists: Wiktionary:ecranisation. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 13:07, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- comment - It exists on Wiktionary because the same editor that created this article created the wiktionary entry. I'm not at all convinced it meets the criteria for wiktionary either but that's not for this dicussion. -- Whpq (talk) 13:15, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.