- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 02:08, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Edge Baronets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not Wikipedia notable. There does not seem to be more to say about the title than it was created for Sir William Edge. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL doesn't bring up anything. After giving a sentence about the title, the article goes into BLP issues about Edge. A tell in the article is that the 1990 reference cited in the article was published before the 2007 BLP information in the article. In sum, there does not appear to be enough reliable, secondary published sources independent of the subject and with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy to maintain an independent article on this topic. -- Suntag ☼ 17:47, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. The baronetcy itself is notable. Kittybrewster ☎ 18:33, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP Surely the many hours of discussion resolved the issue of the notability of Baronetcies long agoOrdyg (talk) 19:05, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Baronetcy is notable and I don't see any BLP issues. The supposed 'tell' doesn't say anything either. It's logical for information to be published before it is included in the article. In sum, the nominator didn't provide any solid reasoning (unless they're making a jump in logic I'm not seeing). - Mgm|(talk) 22:59, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I don't think the nominator tried hard enough. I was able to find other references to the title and present holder with goggle searches - not that google is the be all or end all. AllsoulsDay (talk) 15:52, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.