- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Tawker 05:19, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article is either a vanity page for someone's pet project, or else unverifiable OR Mgekelly - Talk 08:05, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:V--blue520 08:54, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete as original research. See comment of page creator: User talk:My talk page porges 10:47, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. WP:V? Google says no [1]. Deizio 11:22, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per WP:CSD/A7. I should have tagged it that way when I first saw it, instead of suggesting a merge of all thigs! -- I guess that's why I should learn not to edit when I'm dead tired. Sorry! AmiDaniel (Talk) 17:10, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as WP:NOR, thought the idea of a "straight-edge hippy" is so oxymoronic to almost be BJAODN-able.--Isotope23 20:50, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have actually seen evidence of this movement. It should stay, but doesnt deserve an individual article. I say merge. .--HEARTBOUND64
- Note: The above user is one of many suspected sockpuppets of the article's creator. AmiDaniel (Talk) 04:59, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for reasons listed above. DVD+ R/W 04:58, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete as per nom (BTW SxE oppose Evolutionism? WTF!? ... and opposed to "Bullying in school environments"... ? ... but it's just peachy elsewhere I suppose... whatever...) Pete.Hurd 03:08, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.