Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edifice Information Management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 16:15, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edifice Information Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This appears to be a self-promotion article. No sources, no notability, and not much appears in a Google Search (but they've managed to make it appear as if they get google results via Linked In, etc.). Also, this is an orphan article. Timneu22 (talk) 00:09, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I see only a vanity article here. Drmies (talk) 02:04, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete. Couple of gHits, actually, based on this press release from Business Wire: [1]. Besides that, nothing. Bsimmons666 (talk) ^Friend?

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.