Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edinburgh Masker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Close, wrong venue, page tagged for merging by nom. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 21:20, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edinburgh Masker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This the first time I've nominated a deletion, did I format this correctly? I started to edit this article, but then I merged it into the Anti-stuttering devices article. The Edinburgh Masker is one of about twenty anti-stuttering devices, it's better to have one article listing all twenty than to have twenty little articles.--TDKehoe (talk) 19:09, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't, but I'm fixing it. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:23, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep See Help:Merging and moving pages for merger instructions. --Brewcrewer (talk) 19:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep The curious device is no longer manufactured, but it does seem to have been prominent or notable when it was . I can't find any sources to identify notability. scope_creep (talk) 19:38, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to UtherSRG for formating this correctly, and thanks to Brewcrewer for pointing out that what I want to do is a merger, not a deletion. I'll remove the deletion tag and put in a merger tag.--TDKehoe (talk) 21:18, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.